Expert Witness Testimony Experience, Oral & Written

I. NCAA Eligibility Cases

1. Diego Pavia v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Middle Tennessee

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Ryan Downton, Texas Trial Group, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed December 3, 2024.

Injection Granted December 2024.

2. Jett Elad v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, New Jersey

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Marino, Tortorella & Boyle, P.C., Chatham, NJ, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed March 31, 2025

Testified at hearing, April 16, 2025, Trenton, NJ.

Injunction Granted April 2025.

Retained for US Court of Appeals trial, October 2025

3. Rashaun Agee v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)

Brazos County District Court, Texas

Antitrust case under State of Texas Antitrust Act

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Lightfoot Law Birmingham AL Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed October 8, 2025

Oral Testimony hearing on October 13, 2025. 

Injunction granted on October 13, 2025. 

4. Louis Moore v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)

US District Court Northern Texas

Antitrust case under State of Texas Antitrust Act

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Lightfoot Law Birmingham AL Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed August 22, 2025

Testified at hearing on September 24, 2025. 

Injunction granted on September 24, 2025. 

5. Fourqurean, N. v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Western Wisconsin

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by von Briesen & Roper, s.c., Milwaukee, WI

Written Declaration filed August 30, 2025

Deposition, September 3, 2025

Deposition, September 16, 2025

6. Derrin Boyd v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Middle Tennessee

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Baker Botts L.L.P., Washington DC, Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed July 18, 2025. 

7. Walker v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Middle Louisiana

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by David C. Fleshman, Esq., Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, LLP, Attorneys for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed July 1, 2025. 

8. Zeigler, Z. v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Eastern Tennessee

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by LITSON, LLC. Knoxville, TN

Written Declaration filed May 20, 2025

Written Response to NCAA declaration, filed June 3, 2025

9. Ante Brzovic v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, South Carolina

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Peper Law Firm, PA Charleston, SC, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed April 18, 2025

Testified at hearing, May 6, 2025, Charleston SC.

10. Corey Coley v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Eastern North Carolina

Antitrust (Sherman Act)

Written Testimony regarding market definition, market power, and competitive effects regarding NCAA eligibility rules

Retained by Shipman & Wright LLP, Raliegh, NC, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Written Declaration filed April 10, 2025

II. Other Cases

1. Shannon Ray, et al. v National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) 

US District Court, Eastern California, Sacramento Division 

Antitrust (Sherman Act) 

Written Report: statistical analysis, market definition, market power, competitive effects, competitive equity, and financial implications regarding the NCAA Volunteer Coach rule 

Retained by Gustafson Gluek, PLLC; Kirby McInerney, LLP; and Fairmark Partners, LLP 

Written declaration to be filed and Oral Deposition pending, Fall 2025.

2. Williams v Beemiller Inc.

Court of Appeals, New York.

Report of Potential Lost Income for plaintiff Daniel Williams.

Retained by Connors LLP, Buffalo, NY, Attorney for the Plaintiff

Written Report filed January 8, 2020.

3. Gordon and Sari Herbert v Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment (Toronto Raptors Basketball Club) & Matco Trading Inc. (Third Party)

Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Toronto.

Expert Report: An Analysis of the Job Market for NBA Coaches: Career Trajectories and Compensation.

And The Labor Market for NBA Head Coaches Reply to the Analysis and Critique of David Berri. Ph.D.

Retained by Beard Winter LLP, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Attorney for Matcao Trading Inc. 

Expert Report filed July 25, 2017.

Reply filed December 18, 2019